Skip to main content

Antici...pation: October 2016 ENSO forecast

What a difference a month can make! Since my last post, the tropical Pacific has changed gears, and now forecasters think there’s a 70% chance that La Niña conditions will develop this fall. However, any La Niña that develops is likely to be weak, and forecasters aren’t quite as confident that La Niña conditions will persist long enough to be considered a full-blown episode, giving it a 55% chance through the winter.

Ch-ch-ch-changes

When I wrote last month, the tropical Pacific wasn’t giving us much evidence that the atmosphere was responding to the slightly cooler-than-average ocean surface, and most of the computer models were predicting that sea surface temperatures would head back toward average.

Remember, La Niña (just like El Niño) requires action in both the ocean and the atmosphere. During La Niña, the ocean surface in the central and eastern tropical Pacific gets cooler than normal, leading to sinking air and less rain above that region, just as the waters near Indonesia get warmer and cause more rising air and rain. This stronger Walker Circulation is completed by stronger east-to-west surface winds and west-to-east upper level winds.

Schematic of the main parts of the Walker Circulation in the tropical Pacific during La Niña

Generalized Walker Circulation (December-February) anomaly during La Niña events, overlaid on map of average sea surface temperature anomalies. Anomalous ocean cooling (blue-green) in the central and eastern Pacific Ocean and warming over the western Pacific Ocean enhance the rising branch of the Walker circulation over the Maritime Continent and the sinking branch over the eastern Pacific Ocean. Enhanced rising motion is also observed over northern South America, while anomalous sinking motion is found over eastern Africa. NOAA Climate.gov drawing by Fiona Martin. 

This atmospheric circulation works to enhance the cooler ocean surface, both by blowing across the surface just like you’d cool the surface of your coffee, and also by causing cold water from the deep ocean to rise up. Have you ever blown on the surface of a cup of coffee that has cream in it, but hasn’t been stirred up? You’ll see the cream rise up to the surface, brought there by the circulation you’ve created.

Enough with the coffee! Get back to La Niña!

Right, sorry. Anyway, we really didn’t see much of this cycle happening during the summer. Some weak indications were there, but nothing really locked in, and nothing was giving forecasters much confidence that La Niña was still developing. Also, the greater cooling in the tropical Pacific Ocean that had been forecast by earlier computer model predictions from the spring and summer didn’t happen.

Then, starting around mid-September and continuing through the beginning of October, the trade winds in the central tropical Pacific area picked up.

Average near surface winds in September 2016 compared to the 1982-2010 average. Pink areas along the equator in the Pacific ocean show increased trade winds.

Average near-surface winds during September 10—October 1, 2016, compared to the 1982-2010 average. Negative numbers indicate that the wind is more easterly: the east-to-west wind is stronger than average. The winds along the equator usually blow east-to-west (the trade winds); the pink area shows the enhanced trades. Climate.gov figure from CPC data.

Short-term fluctuations in the wind like this can be difficult to predict more than a week ahead of time. This burst was associated with subseasonal variability—changes that happen over a few days or a couple of weeks.

Several other indicators also started to look more La Niña-like during September, including more clouds and rain over Indonesia and less in the central Pacific. The two measurements we use to follow the relationship between the conditions in the east/central Pacific and Indonesia, the Southern Oscillation Index and the Equatorial Southern Oscillation Index, are both positive. This means lower-than-average air pressure over Indonesia and higher-than-average in the east/central Pacific—a more-active Walker Circulation. (Check out Tony’s post about the many ways we measure ENSO.)

And then, of course, there’s the sea surface temperature in the Niño3.4 region, which dropped slightly during September, averaging around 0.6 degrees C below average, and became even cooler toward the end of the month.

Line graph showing how ocean temperatures in the Nino3.4 region compared for all moderate to strong El Nino years since 1950. The black line for 2015-2016 shows that this event was similar to past events in its progression.

Monthly sea surface temperature in the Niño 3.4 region of the tropical Pacific compared to the long-term average for all moderate-to-strong El Niño years and the following year since 1950, showing how 2015/16 (black line) compares to other events. Climate.gov graph based on ERSSTv4 temperature data.

The amount of cool water below the surface increased a bit during September, too, after a few months of gradual reduction from the large amount that was present in the spring. This cooler water provides a source for future surface cooling.

All this adds up to a renewed La Niña Watch, as it looks like conditions are favorable for La Niña to develop.

However…

El Niño and La Niña are seasonal phenomena, meaning that these specific conditions have to be present for several months in a row. There can be short-term fluctuations in the winds, pressure, and so on, but the average over the several months must be consistent. This is why ENSO is considered a seasonal climate, not weather, phenomenon. 

So we’ll watch the tropical Pacific closely over the next month, to see if the suggestions of La Niña that showed up in the second half of September are here to stay. The current computer model forecasts are predicting a few more three-month-average periods of around half a degree (C) below average in the Niño3.4 region—right at the La Niña threshold.

A weak La Niña likely means lower confidence impacts on U.S. weather and climate during the winter compared to a stronger event. Stay tuned for an upcoming post about the Climate Prediction Center’s winter outlook.

Ocean temperature anomalies in September 2016 centered on the Pacific Ocean. Colder waters in blue are present along the equator but everywhere else red blobs of warmer than average water reside.

Average sea surface temperature during September, 2016, compared to the 1981-2010 average. Climate.gov figure, from CPC data. All resemblance to a lava lamp is accidental.

Comments

I would be interested in knowing if the garbage patch gyro's all of the oceans can have a warming or cooling effect of the whole weather, cloud formation, water system. If attempting to clean up.. or process this waste, could we, humans, create.. or disrupt these normal pasterns known as La'Lina and El'Nino, to a degree at which would be beneficial for the planet's weather patterns?.. Or is it just too large of a mess for man to deal with? Also, it seems to me the warmer air I have seen from the Western tropics, over the last 12 months - 15 months ending about mid September, 2016, have caused this stream of warm tropical air flow up into Alaska and northward to the pole. This month, however, this same stream of warmer tropical flow has moved slightly to the south and east, I have seen a shift to a more normal pattern, that shows the weather fronts or low pressures are moving in a more direct West to East to ENE flow direction from the area of the tropics in the Western Pacific, pushing, leading the fronts to basically ending up to just south of Vancouver Island, BC. With this shift to a more.. normal pattern could we see a cooling trend for the Arctic Ocean around the North Pole, meaning more sea-ice?

I find it interesting that this La Nina is not too far of from the 98 La Nina in the 3.4 zone. Where as in Nino 1.2, things are much different (cooler than normal in 98, warmer than normal now). This is somewhat similar to how last year's El Nino was as strong or stronger in Nino 3.4, but WAY weaker in Nino 1.2 This all leads me to think that we cannot look at past analogs. In addition, both last year's El Nino and this year's La Nina are a bit westward displaced. I might even call our La Nina a modoki.

If I understand correctly, your "2015" in the monthly sea surface temperature graph should read "2016."

thanks for asking. I double checked, but, actually, no, the black label was purposely placed right at the end of 2015. Each of the lines shows the evolution of the Niño 3.4 SST anomaly for different El Niño events, beginning in year 1 of the event, and continuing on through the decay and transition period. Sorry for the confusion, though. Next time we do a similar graph, we'll consider ways to make the time periods more obvious.[[{"fid":"20124","view_mode":"default","type":"media","attributes":{"height":"464","width":"797","class":"media-element file-default"},"link_text":null,"fields":{"alignment":""}}]]

In reply to by Scott Gruhn

I do keep track of this because it seems that during a La Nina the Pacific Northwest gets more rain and snow.

The experts are very busy this week, so I am filling in on questions as best i can. Have a look at this featured image we did showing typical la Niña impacts during Northern Hemisphere winter and summer. It doesn't appear that there is a "typical" La Niña impact on the central Andes in southern hemisphere summer.

[[{"fid":"18956","view_mode":"default","type":"media","attributes":{"height":"660","width":"620","class":"media-element file-default"},"link_text":null,"fields":{"alignment":""}}]]

This is not such an easy statement to verify. First, we don't see a La Nina impact in the Andes, except maybe right along the equator in Ecuador or Peru, on the teleconnection map for northern winter, that Rebecca provided. We would have to specify just which area in the Central Andes we're talking about. Then we would need to choose a best climate data set, whether temperature or precipitation. Then we would verify the effect of La Nina in the Andes. If the teleconnection map is correct, and we're working south of the equator in the Andes, we should see little or no systematic effect of La Nina. 

There is no mention of the possibility of the pattern flipping back to neutral, other than the 70%. Is the flip-flop in the pattern from earlier this summer to the mid-Sept to mid-Oct pattern typical of past transitions from El Nino to La Nina? If not, could it be an indicator of ENSO instability potentially resulting from climate change impacts?

The path from strong El Nino to a La Nina of some given strength often does not occur in a straight line, but rather with some bumps in the road caused by disruptions in the formation of good ocean-atmosphere coupling, by intraseasonal activity like the Madden Julian Oscillation, or others. So it is not unusual, particuarly if we look at 1-month data. Regarding the effect of climate change, it so far has not had a great effect on ENSO behavior. There are some minor ways it has affected it, such as the greater warming in the western tropical Pacific than the eastern. But as far as causing flip-flops during a period of transition, I don't know of evidence along those lines.

In reply to by Andy

Given the recent change in La Nina how does New England fare this winter? It seems like colder - more snow. Is that correct?

Any comments about the differences in the Walker circulation regarding central Pacific La Nina events and more typical La Nina events where the cool anomalies extend into S. America? Seems like the models are suggesting this will be a CP event. I have heard the bigger differences are found in the Atlantic basin.

Rainfall deciles for the past 3 months in Inland East Australia show extremely wet conditions (some highest on record), which is typically associated with La Nina conditions. If the dynamics of the climate system (i.e. increased convection in Western tropical pacific) suggest that a La Nina is underway - does this point to the limitations of tracking ENSO using an index in isolation such as the SOI or Nino 3.4 SSTAs - and if so, is there a way to look at the system more holistically?

For us here in the SE US, neutral to weak La Nina's are generally pretty favorable for winter weather. Of course, we still need high latitude blocking to make it more memorable, but we've had some pretty good snows with very weak Nina's.

Am guessing that the Walker circulation, as a 2-dimensional flow, might over-simplify the actual atmospheric dynamics? Wondering if the Hadley circulation needs to be factored in to the considerations.? If the outflow from the top of the deep convection over the pool(s) of warmest Pacific equatorial waters has a more meridional flow (Hadley cell) than zonal flow (Walker cell) then the resultant return flow (easterly winds) along the equator at the ocean surface might be weaker. And conversely if the mass and heat momentum out of the tops of the towering TRWs is 'jetting' zonally towards the East then the resultant easterly surface winds would be stronger and help initiate the La Nina conditions. How are the Hadley cells factored into the models?

Add new comment

CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.