El Niño and the Galápagos
This is a guest post by Prof. Kris Karnauskas of the University of Colorado Boulder. He runs the Oceans and Climate Lab (@OceansClimateCU), which aims to improve the understanding the tropical ocean and atmosphere, its interaction with ecosystems, and how it has changed in the past and will change in the future. In his spare time we hear he runs ultra-marathons, which is simultaneously very cool and kind of crazy.
What happens when a tiny island rises from the seafloor and stands directly in the path of one of the grandest ocean currents in the world? This happened millions of years ago, when the Galapagos Archipelago formed. We now have penguins in the tropics and such a remarkable biological system that it got Darwin thinking about life. There is far more than one could learn in a lifetime about geology, ecology, biology, and evolution from the Galápagos, partly because of where they are on the planet. In fact, it is precisely where the islands just happened to have formed—smack on the equator—that makes them so fascinating and important.
20,000 leagues under the sea
Imagine you could see miles beneath the surface of the sea, revealing highways of currents in every direction—sometimes even stacked on top of one other. In the tropical Pacific, you would notice the Equatorial Undercurrent flowing eastward some 8,000 miles, all the way from Papua New Guinea toward South America—about a third of the way around the planet.
This current is centered at a depth near 150-650 feet across most of the Pacific and rises up (upwells) toward the surface near South America. It moves at a top speed of a little over 3 mph (just a casual walking pace), which doesn’t sound very impressive. However, multiplying by its width and height reveals that about 10 billion gallons of cold water are moving by every second!
The Equatorial Undercurrent was discovered accidently in the early 1950s, when long-line fishermen noticed their gear drifting eastward beneath their boat—the opposite direction as the wind and surface current. Now we know it’s a fundamental part of the global ocean circulation.
Penguins and fur seals and tortoises, oh my
The Galápagos formed on the equator some millions of years ago in the eastern Pacific. The largest island (Isabela) extends from about 1.1°S to 0.2°N. Isla Isabela quite literally forms a wall in the ocean that just happens to have the same dimensions as the Equatorial Undercurrent barreling toward it from the west. Some of the water manages to sneak around the islands, while some rises up to the surface.
The cold water in the deep ocean is full of nutrients. When it rises up into the sunlight, it fuels photosynthesis and a remarkable abundance of phytoplankton, the basic food for much of the ocean ecosystem. This food source has allowed the Galapagos to develop into a unique outpost of biodiversity. Virtually all of the penguins and fur seals live along the western shores of Isabela and Fernandina (Boersma, 1977; Vargas et al., 2005, 2006) where the upwelling is strongest and water temperatures are measurably cooler than elsewhere in the vicinity.
There is another source of upwelling waters in the Galapagos: the trade winds, which normally blow from east to the west on either side of the equator. These winds push water generally westward and away from the equator. Cold water from the deep ocean rises up to replace it. The Galápagos sit right in the middle of the tongue of cold water that results from the wind-driven upwelling.
But then El Niño comes along
What happens when nature throws a wrench in this delicate balance of physics and biology? During an El Niño event, the Galápagos is geographically positioned in the heart of the warming ocean waters. (See this map of October 2015, for example.) The change in water temperatures can affect the marine life directly. Upwelling from the Equatorial Undercurrent, for instance, is reduced during an El Niño, reducing the food supply in the near-surface waters. Also, during El Niño, the trade winds are weakened, so that source of upwelling is reduced. In other words, El Niño is a double-whammy for the Galápagos, doing away with the broader wind-driven upwelling and the Equatorial Undercurrent.
Precipitous declines in the Galapagos penguin population have followed past major El Niño events, including 1982-83 and 1997-98. Penguin population collapses during or following major El Niño events are understandable from an oceanographic perspective. The Equatorial Undercurrent weakens substantially and even disappears altogether during such events (Firing et al., 1983), with dramatic consequences for the entire food web from schooling fish to penguins (Boersma, 1978 and 1998; Boersma et al., 2013, fur seals (Aurioles and Trillmich, 2008), marine iguanas (Nelson et al., 2004), and other marine predators.
The most amazing thing to me is still the coincidence of the islands; had they formed a degree north or south of where they did, none of this would matter. The Galápagos would not stand in the way of the Equatorial Undercurrent; consequently, the local oceanographic conditions (and the ecology that depends on them) would be fundamentally different. Upon stepping off the HMS Beagle in 1835, what biota would Charles Darwin have found, and how might that have influenced contemporary thought, philosophy, religion, and the development of evolutionary biology? It is this fluke of geography that helped create such abundant biodiversity in the Galápagos, but also the islands vulnerability to Earth’s great climatic heartbeat, El Niño.
Lead reviewer: Michelle L'Heureux
Karnauskas, K. B., R. Murtugudde, and W. B. Owens, 2014: Climate and the Global Reach of the Galápagos Archipelago: State of the Knowledge, in The Galápagos: A Natural Laboratory for the Earth Sciences (eds K. S. Harpp, E. Mittelstaedt, N. d'Ozouville and D. W. Graham), John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Hoboken, New Jersey, doi: 10.1002/9781118852538.ch11.
Karnauskas, K. B., S. Jenouvrier, C. W. Brown, and R. Murtugudde, 2015: Strong sea surface cooling in the eastern equatorial Pacific and implications for Galápagos Penguin conservation. Geophys. Res. Lett., 42(15), 6432-6437, doi: 10.1002/2015GL064456.
Aurioles, D., and F. Trillmich (2008), Arctocephalus galapagoensis, The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (2014.3).
Boersma, P. D. (1977), An ecological and behavioral study of the Galápagos Penguin, Living Bird, 15, 43–93.
Boersma, P. D. (1978), Breeding patterns of Galápagos Penguins as an indicator of oceanographic conditions, Science, 200, 1481–1483.
Boersma, P. D. (1998), Population trends of the Galápagos Penguin: Impacts of El Niño and La Niña, Condor, 100(2), 245–253.
Boersma, P. D., A. Steinfurth, G. Merlen, G. Jiménez–Uzcátegui, F. Vargas, and P. G. Parker (2013), Galápagos Penguin (Spheniscus mendiculus), in Penguins Natural History and Conservation, edited by P. G. Borboroglu and P. D. Boersma, 360 pp., Univ. of Washington Press, Seattle, Wash. [Available at www.washington.edu/uwpress/search/books/BORPEN.html.]
Firing, E., R. Lukas, J. Sadler, and K. Wyrtki (1983), Equatorial Undercurrent disappears during 1982–1983 El Niño, Science, 222(4628), 1121–1123.
Nelson, K., H. Snell, and M. Wikelsi (2004), Amblyrhynchus cristatus, The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (Version 2014.3).
Vargas, H., C. Lougheed, and H. Snell (2005), Population size and trends of the Galápagos Penguin Spheniscus mendiculus, Ibis, 147(2), 367–374.
Vargas, F. H., S. Harrison, S. Rea, and D. W. Macdonald (2006), Biological effects of El Niño on the Galápagos Penguin, Biol. Conserv., 127(1), 107–114.
Vargas, F. H., R. C. Lacy, P. J. Johnson, A. Steinfurth, R. J. M. Crawford, P. D. Boersma, and D. W. Macdonald (2007), Modelling the effect of El Niño on the persistence of small populations: The Galápagos Penguin as a case study, Biol. Conserv., 137(1), 138–148.
The ENSO blog is written, edited, and moderated by Michelle L’Heureux (NOAA CPC), Emily Becker and Tom DiLiberto (contractors to CPC), Anthony Barnston (IRI), and Rebecca Lindsey (contractor to NOAA CPO). Posts reflect the views of the bloggers themselves and not necessarily Climate.gov, NOAA, or Columbia University/IRI.