No, you can’t blame it all on El Niño
...but it's still a seasonal forecaster's best friend.
After El Niño conditions were declared in March and Climate Prediction Center’s latest forecast predicted El Niño’s continued strengthening during the upcoming summer and fall, I think it is safe to say we are well within the time period where everything will be blamed on El Niño.
It rained on your wedding day? El Niño. Had an outdoor picnic ruined by a late afternoon thunderstorm? El Niño. Was it hot …during the summer? El Niño.
Usually these are exaggerations. Mike Halpert and Tony Barnston in past posts have shown what type of U.S. and global impacts are associated with an El Niño for the late fall and winter and for the summer, respectively. But aside from its effect on seasonal hurricane activity, El Niño impacts over the US during the summer are minimal at best.
Granted, El Niño does have substantial impact on rainfall patterns elsewhere globally during June through August. However, it is hard to overcome the suspicion that El Niño is pulling all the atmospheric strings and creating an ever-increasing amount of extreme weather events compared to a year without an event.
So allow me to ask some simple questions. Is El Niño causing every weather event we see? Are there a greater number of extreme precipitation events during El Niño years than a normal year? How do we benefit from knowing where El Niño can influence these events?
When we talk about El Niño, we often talk about certain patterns in average rainfall that are observed across the globe in El Niño years. Often overlooked is that ENSO is not the only influence on where or how much rain falls in any given region in a given year. ENSO is only the cause of roughly 15-20% of the extreme precipitation (Dai et al 1997). The rest, 80-85%, is due to other factors on our planet. If extreme precipitation was a large pizza, ENSO would account for only 2 slices.
And because ENSO does not control 100% of the precipitation extremes and because weather is, well, weather—somewhat chaotic—no single El Niño or La Niña year will be a perfect match with the idealized “El Niño” or “La Niña” pattern. All of which leads to the conclusion that, for most of you, while I apologize that your [insert outdoor event] got rained on, it probably wasn’t due to El Niño.
Even though not everything is caused by El Niño, El Niño episodes can still have a greater number of extreme precipitation events than normal, correct? After all, I have already listed many places where we see a tilt in the odds towards significant seasonal average rainfall departures from normal. While these high-profile regions of drought or excess precipitation garner plenty of headlines, research on observations since 1950 suggests only 20-30% of land areas across the globe are potentially affected during El Niño and La Niña (Mason and Goddard 2001).
What about the other 70-80% of land areas? In 2005, research by Goddard and Dilley showed that the number of large anomalies in 1-month precipitation totals over land from 30°S to 30°N is very similar regardless of whether it was an El Niño, La Niña or Neutral (Goddard and Dilley 2005). This even takes into account the regions that have ENSO impacts.
In fact, the authors found that not only are extreme precipitation anomalies during El Niño and La Niña comparable to those during Neutral conditions, but also that climate-related disasters do not increase during El Niño/La Niña years. In essence, while there could be high profile impacts in certain regions during El Niño or La Niña, there are also inevitably going to be large precipitation anomalies somewhere across the globe even during years without an El Niño or La Niña.
However, a key fact is that during neutral years, we are less likely to know where these extremes could occur. When El Niño and La Niña occur, the location of some of a given year’s biggest wet or dry events becomes more predictable.
So is knowing an El Niño is here or coming a good thing for a forecaster or anyone interested in making bets on the future? Only 20-30% of land areas show a repeatable pattern during ENSO events (Mason and Goddard 2001). Plus, ENSO explains only 15-20% of what is seen in extreme precipitation (Dai et al 1997), which seems tiny. If I were an actor and were told that my presence on camera accounted for only 20% of the action, I wouldn’t call home and tell my mom I’m a leading man. But, to a forecaster, that is a large amount of information.
For one thing, unlike other atmospheric patterns that influence weather for weeks to seasons—the Arctic Oscillation (AO), North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) or Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO), for example—ENSO is forecastable on a monthly to seasonal time scale. And while never a guarantee, if ENSO occurs or is predicted several months in advance of its peak influence, then we can assume a tilt in the odds towards certain impacts.
That sounds like a reasonable explanation in theory. Has it worked out that way in the real seasonal forecasting world, though? To check, I averaged Heidke skill scores (one way to grade the accuracy of a forecast-- see here) from 1995 to present for seasonal precipitation outlooks for the contiguous U.S.* during the peak of El Niño and La Niña (October-December through February-April) and compared them to the ENSO state. While these forecasts were not for extremes in precipitation, you would still expect a better forecast of above or below-normal precipitation given an ENSO event.
Skill scores for predicted precipitation were indeed higher during both El Niño and La Niña than they were for Neutral. This result is consistent with previous research that found seasonal rainfall forecasts are better during ENSO events and are often the best when ENSO events are stronger (Goddard and Dilley, 2005, Livezey and Timofeyeva, 2008, Barnston et al., 2010).
In the end, while you cannot blame everything on El Niño or La Niña, El Niños and La Niñas still provide forecasters with a better idea for where changes in impacts (extreme or not) will occur. A boon to forecasters who already have their work cut out for them deciphering our chaotic atmosphere.
*Updated June 26, 2015–Text was revised to clarify that the analysis covers outlooks for the contiguous United States.
Dai, A., I.Y. Fung, and A.D. Del Genio, 1997: Surface observed global land precipitation variations during 1900-88. J. Climate, 10, 2943-2962.
Mason, S. J., and L. Goddard, 2001: Probabilistic precipitation anomalies associated with ENSO. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 82, 619-638.
Goddard, Li., and M. Dilley, 2005: El Niño: Catastrophe or opportunity. J. Climate, 18, 651-665.
Livezey, R. E., and M. M. Timofeyeva, 2008: The first decade of long-lead U.S. seasonal forecasts— Insights from a skill analysis. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 89, 843-854
Barnston, A. G., S. Li., S. J. Mason, D. G. DeWitt, L. Goddard and X. Gong, 2010: Verification of the first 11 years of IRI’s seasonal climate forecasts. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol, 49, 493-520.
The ENSO blog is written, edited, and moderated by Michelle L’Heureux (NOAA CPC), Emily Becker and Tom DiLiberto (contractors to CPC), Anthony Barnston (IRI), and Rebecca Lindsey (contractor to NOAA CPO). Posts reflect the views of the bloggers themselves and not necessarily Climate.gov, NOAA, or Columbia University/IRI.